Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
“In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.” Desiderius Erasmus
Let’s make a generalization: If you work for a non-profit organization, you are living in the past. You’re doing something outdated, for reasons you can’t quite articulate, and at an unknown cost – especially consider the opportunity cost of doing something less efficient.
Fortunately for you, the eager non-profiteer, so is everyone else. Here are three stories (no names, to save face) of non-profits that might sound familiar:
In 2006, one organization I knew had a very old computer sitting in the corner of the office. It served one purpose: to host a very old piece of donor management software on a very old operating system. Only one person knew how to use this software, and it wasn’t very helpful anyway. Not only that, but it was increasingly difficult to support the failing hardware. There were dozens of opportunities to upgrade or find a new system over the course of about a decade. The cost to the organization was measured in lots of time and the occasional hardware replacement.
“If you aren’t getting better, you’re getting worse.” Executives, employees, and board members need to invest some portion of their time in professional development to get better at what they do, or they’ll soon find themselves incompetent. Worse yet, they won’t even know they’re incompetent.
A large non-profit had very low turnover, which meant that hundreds of its employees had been in essentially the same job for 15+ years. These employees were more likely to be unhappy, but wouldn’t quit their jobs. They weren’t let go because they were technically doing their work, but they weren’t providing the value of their more engaged, productive counterparts. This meant that the more engaged employees were more likely to get assignments, sometimes overworking them. The cost to the organization is in lost opportunities, some unnecessary overtime, and higher turnover of the best employees.
A few years ago, another organization needed to print about 900 letters to fold, stuff, and mail to constituents. One of the staff members dedicated an entire day to hitting File > Print and then printing a single copy. Once it was printed, she did this again. Two down. After a whole day of the most inefficient software use I’ve ever heard of, someone found out and pointed out that she could just hit File > Print and enter the quantity to print out. The cost to the organization was 7+ hours of this employee’s time, and the cost of her pay.
Nearly every non-profit is under-resourced and over-burdened, leaving no time or money to invest in new tools, professional development, re-evaluating their processes, and so on.
What these non-profits rarely realize is that they could save money and time by investing in those resources. There’s an ROI on many of these things, and it’s worth investigating.
It doesn’t take much to gain a tremendous advantage over other organizations while freeing up your own resources. There are tons of ways to do it: books, seminars, networking, and lots of online options:
Tip: If you’re new to reading blogs or you can’t find time to keep up with them check out my Feed Reader 101 post on how to keep tabs on thousands of articles each month in as little time as possible.
Sadly you are correct -- but only part of the time. After having worked for several larger non-profit organizations, there are some out there dedicated to expanding their resources, improving the education of their workforce and investing in professional development. They are few and far between, but deserve a pat on the back for their efforts. I believe that for every one of the sad stories about non-profit organizations, there are at least one or two great ones! AND I have worked for both FOR profit and non-profit companies.
Sadly you are correct -- but only part of the time. After having worked for several larger non-profit organizations, there are some out there dedicated to expanding their resources, improving the education of their workforce and investing in professional development. They are few and far between, but deserve a pat on the back for their efforts. I believe that for every one of the sad stories about non-profit organizations, there are at least one or two great ones! AND I have worked for both FOR profit and non-profit companies.
I love this post and I also think the issue is more complex. Nonprofit organizations are judged (often harshly) by how much money goes to mission activities. Donors, the media, politicians, etc. all use this as the go-to metric for success. What happens? Exactly what you outline...infrastructure and employee development suffer because spending money there would inflate the "management" line item of the budget.
Great Post, Chas! I feel like you just took a tour of my office and wrote a report of your findings...Right down to the crusty old computer in the corner. You make some great points about investing in the future of the organization vs. relying on the "This is the way we've always done it" model. Thanks for a fantastic post!
Chas, have you been hiding in the cube reserved in one of my client offices for the computer housing vintage member files for "archive referencing?" I don't know how else you would have found that picture or this much insight! ;)
I'm not only relieved to hear that other nonprofit professionals are noticing this trend, but am excited to share your resources with others.
Sometimes, at best, an organization has an alarming wake-up call and is forced to make significant investments in a short period of time to play catch up. Those out-of-touch employees you reference get confused, disinfranchised, or fired; morale suffers (not to mention bonuses); and the organization goes through this crazy out of body experience while making huge changes that could have been implemented more gradually and comfortably with a consistent approach to technological and management evolution. Not to mention, the membership suffers too.
Thanks again, Chas. This is a great post.
Yes, Chas - these are certainly problems present in many non-profits. And yet, I've found that working in the non-profit field, I not only get to work for causes that I care about, but I rapidly accelerated my professional growth by the sheer fact that I quickly got plugged into challenging projects, and because I'm a nerd at heart, I've been able to research and learn about new technologies that can aid our org's initiatives. 12 years and 3 non-profits later, I'm still growing and learning...likely this is more due to my inherent curiosity, than any effort by my employers to help me advance. But, I'm glad to be doing work I believe in.
I will start this by saying I work for a non-profit and despite the challenges, I probably wouldn't have it any other way. Nevertheless, this is a very true and VERY significant issue, one that many places choose to avoid. I know it is tough out there and non-profits need to function as a strange sort of hybrid: corporate in some ways like finance management or investing in marketing, employee development and technology and yet, they need to be focused on their mission and their contribution to the community.
Perhaps we are all part of the problem, I know I've dealt with understaffing and lack of resources. In fact, in many places they are seen as a badge of honor. However, as a new generation of leadership moves in I hope we can change that. Great post!