
Every year, the faceless corporation does a big fundraising drive for a particular charity. It's the same one every year. In October, they do an entire week focused solely on raising money for said charity.
I don't have a problem with charity - but as always, something about this whole thing irks me. Personally, I think charity is my business and no one else's. I should be able to give to whatever organization I want. In previous jobs we could have money taken off our cheques and donated to whatever charity we wanted providing they were legit. At the faceless corp, we can only give to this one specific charity. If we choose to donate to another one, the first charity takes a 20% cut of your donation.
What kind of shit is that?
Secondly - Since this campaign has started I have received three different emails asking for donations, all of them form letters - but one in particular has a link that is attached to MY name, that will register the donation I make, or, in this case, don't make. Why do I have a feeling that somewhere, someone is watching this, realizing I haven't donated a dime since I've been working at my current job? On top of the emails, someone from our department comes around and asks me for money, so no I actually have to vocally say no, I'm choosing not to support this charity.
I can think of a million other charities I would rather support than the option I currently have, but there's a bigger problem here. I'm broke. I am too broke to donate my money to anyone right now. Sorry. That's just the way it is right now. I have ten dollars in the bank til Thursday, and I need it. End of story. In fact, the only way I'm giving that away is if some kid comes to my door selling chocolate almonds, because let's face it, that shit is delicious.
I probably wouldn't have such a negative opinion of this whole endeavor by the FC if I didn't feel forced to participate. In fact, that's exactly what this is all about. Push me, I push back. I've always been that way, but in this case, I think my point has some validity.
For one - I know I'm not the only one in the world who's broke, this is not a case of woe is me. It's just that when you ask me to stretch too much, I become torn, like any fabric would. Also - as I mentioned, I think charity is my business and only my business, and I don't think my workplace should be "suggesting" any one charity over the next, especially if I don't agree with what said charity does with the money.
I'll do my part where I see fit, just leave me alone about it.
I completely understand your frustration. I have tried my best to donate time and talents over the past few years because of being strapped for cash. If an organization wants to have a philanthropic reputation, it shouldn't come by it at the expense of its employees. Honestly, I find ones that work with different charities to be more honorable, especially since much of the giving is inspired from stories from their own people.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I completely agree. I'm not against charity at all, but I prefer to choose which charity I give to, when I give, and how much I give. It's funny that with all of the emails they send out asking donations they don't have any explanation of what the charity is going to do with your money, who it's going to, or case studies. And most of the big charities they ask us to donate to take a huge chunk of the money for just organizing the drive. AND in addition to that, my company gives cash prizes back to some employees who donated "early". It's practically a charity raffle.
And then they have the audacity to make me feel bad for not "donating to charity".
You say you feel pressured to donate. But really, what has your company done to pressure you? The fact that they send you a personally addressed letter, that they have a big fundraiser, and they make it easy to donate from your paycheck does not constitute "pressure". Even having someone come and ask for money isn't really pressure (unless they say "I noticed you haven't donated yet.. we frown on that here"). There are valid reasons for this, not the least of which that the corporation really does care about charity and they want to get the word out and make it easy to donate.
One of the few rules I have learned in my life is "when someone does something that pisses you off, chances are they didn't do it on purpose."
I have the unique perspective of having worked for two companies that were exact opposites when it came to pressure to donate. The first would give the managers expensive gifts tied to their departments participation in the charity. Needless to say, when the manager is going to get a free trip to Hawaii for 100% participation, you're gonna feel some pressure to participate.
My current company is nothing like that. Yeah, the fundraiser is a huge deal, and we are constantly reminded to donate. But not once have I ever had anyone come to me and personally pressure me to donate (I do donate, but not every year).
So maybe you just have the wrong idea about your company. Is it so hard to give them the benefit of the doubt, and imagine they really are just trying to make a difference?

I worked for a company that tried to pressure us. How? By requiring us to return our pledge forms whether or not we were going to participate.
I threw mine in the trash. Nothing happened.
Churches used to, and some still do, post which families contributed and how much they contributed. I have to imagine guilt and public appearance contributed to some families motivations.
The Red Cross comes to my office building once every 2 months, and I regularly ask colleagues to join me in giving. I think increased awareness is important. That being said, for those who can't contribute money, there are often many other ways that you can be supportive with time.
I tend to agree with Scott, that it sounds less like true pressure and more like a solid awareness campaign.
Carlee makes a good point. I feel much more comfortable donating when it is transparent where the money is going, how it will be used (ie case studies or the opportunity to volunteer time as well) and that the it be clear what % will end up covering admin costs.
Here is an interesting site that keeps an eye on these guys: