Where ambitious young professionals connect and grow

Already a member?

Click here to login

Welcome to Brazen Careerist!

Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.

  
Posted On 08.27.09

Many of us choose to live in a world where we do as much as possible on our own. We cook for ourselves, we do our own laundry, walk our own dogs, and maybe, just maybe, mow our own grass. We choose to do these things partially because we want to, but mostly because we can’t afford to pay anyone else to do it.

But why then do we pay people to do more complicated/expensive tasks? We pay someone to cut our hair (I don’t but you do), pay a contractor to put in new floors, and pay a mechanic to do that magical thing known as an “oil change”. If we can’t afford to pay someone to walk our dogs how can we afford to pay someone to put in those new hardwoods your boxer is bound to scratch up? The answer lies in time. Often, we actually have time to DO these things, but we don’t have time to LEARN to do these things. As a result, we pay someone to do it for us.

My good friend over at Free Money Finance turned me on to a story about outsourcing your chores. It isn’t his post but in fact the something originally posted in US News. It’s amazing how short-sighted this article actually is. The article gives all the pros of outsourcing your chores without covering the whole story. The argument is based on “how much money do you make an hour? If you can pay someone less to do your chores then you should”. So basically if you make $30/hour and can pay someone $10/hour to clean your house, then you should. There are two related problems with this assumption:

1) Who is going to pay YOU? The author assumes that by freeing up that hour you can continue to work, thus netting yourself $20/hour. This works great for the self-employed like those featured in the article. However having an extra hour to work doesn’t mean you have an extra $20 to net. Most of us are confined to the 40 hour work week, this gives us plenty of time to take care of the chores. My dad, a professor, could work 40 hours or 100 hours (it’s closer to 100 than 40) and he’s still going to make the same salary. Every additional hour he works in fact dilutes his “hourly rate” because of this. In order to work an additional hour due to reduced chores, you actually need to have someone willing to pay you for that extra hour, most of us don’t.

2) You don’t actually make $30/hour. It’s not even close to that in fact. You make $30 for every hour you work, but you only work 40 hours a week. There are 168 hours in a week. So you actually make about $7.14/hour. That’s $7.14 for every hour of every day. $7.14 for sleep, for time with the kids, for watching TV, and doing chores.

You don’t think about $7.14/hour when you decide to do your chores instead of hiring someone. But your subconscious is. The deepest darkest part of your brain (somewhere near that lost memory from that one night from freshman year) is actually computing how much your time is really worth and seeing if they can hire someone to do it at that price. Can you pay someone $7.14/hour to clean your house, mow your lawn, or walk your dog? Unlikely, unless you hire someone willing to work for less than minimum wage in most states. So your mind decides for you to do the chores instead of hiring someone. This is the same reason we elect to pay someone to cut our hair, put down hardwoods, and change our oil. We can’t pay someone $7.14/hour to teach us. And since we won’t use these skills often enough to make a livelihood, we call it “convenient”.

So when we’re deciding what tasks we can and cannot do ourselves we again look at two things.

1) I can do this myself, but can I pay someone to do it for me for less than my REAL hourly rate?

2) If I can’t do this myself, can I pay someone less than my REAL hourly rate to teach me?

If the answer to #1 is “no” then you’ll likely elect to do it yourself. If the answer is “yes” then it’s a tossup. If the

answer to #2 is “no” then it makes the most sense to pay someone more just to do it. If the answer happens to be “yes” then you have to decide whether to learn or to pay a convenience tax to have someone do it for you for more. What you have to ask yourself first is, what is my REAL hourly rate?

Those of us limited to either a fixed salary or fixed hours to work per week will find a very low REAL hourly rate. If you’re self-employed, or can bill by the hour for extended periods of time, your REAL hourly rate will be much higher. These people are unique

But those people are rare, and we call them exceptions. And all US News was really reporting is that there are exceptions to accepted norms. Wow, throw my Pulitzer over there with the others.

Share and Enjoy:

Comments

08.27.09

"You don’t think about $7.14/hour when you decide to do your chores instead of hiring someone. But your subconscious is. The deepest darkest part of your brain (somewhere near that lost memory from that one night from freshman year) is actually computing how much your time is really worth and seeing if they can hire someone to do it at that price."

What's your evidence for that claim?

08.27.09

Hi Phillip,

You are definitely on to something here. The right way to value your time is by Marginal Cost and Opportunity Cost. Marginal Cost of an hour of your time is how much the *next* hour of your time is worth. As you point out, you cannot just use your salary as a measure, because for most of us, if we work an extra hour this week, we won't make an extra $30 (or whatever).

To get a real number, you have to find opportunities to earn extra money for the extra hours, and then find out how much you can make from those extra opportunities. Sometimes this will be *more* than your normal rate, as in overtime wages. Other times, this will be *less* than your normal rate, as in a part-time job in retail. Even if your marginal rate is lower than your normal salary rate, it still might be worth outsourcing your chores - maybe you make $30 / hour in your job, and can make $15 / hour as a food server in the evenings or weekends. Any household chore that costs you less than $15 per hour is probably a good deal.

This brings us to the next measure, Opportunity Cost. This is the cost of the other thing you could be doing. Maybe you like to surf, but cannot do it as much as you like, because of household chores. If you can outsource them for $10 per hour, then think about the cost of surfing as $10 per hour. If this seems like a good deal, you should take it.

The key to this kind of thinking is not to add up how much money you made last week, but to consider the money you could make right now, if you made a different choice - that is the cost / value of that choice.

08.27.09

Ahh... but value is not just defined by price. It's also defined by benefit gained. If you HATE cleaning, it would be worth it to you because of the benefit gained.

08.27.09

I like this post because it's well thought out.

However, I do subscribe to paying people to clean my apt because gaining the time to relax, spend it with loved ones, or sleep is more important to me and my overall health and quality of life than cleaning. You can never buy more time, you can always make more money.

Studies have also shown that your standard of living doesn't change dramatically once you make $40k a year. To see a marked improvement in your lifestyle only comes once you make enough money to have your own private jet. Everything in the middle of $40k & "jet money" is basically the same in terms of life satisfaction and happiness.

08.27.09

To further what Jeannie has mentioned, value is not just defined by price.

In most cases paying someone to remodel a part of your home, or lay tile isn't just compensating labor and materials, you're paying for the quality and specificity of contracted work. Learning how to add a room to your house, build a deck, or lay tile may be worth the effort, but is it worth your investment when problems that manifest themselves later on turn out to be the fault of some over-looked nuances you yourself didn't catch?

I've worked in the construction business for quite some time now and can tell you firsthand that although trying to do things for yourself that might require contracted labor (even if it's not about finances) usually sounds good, in most cases you end up paying more for repair or paying for the entire job to be done a second time, correctly. What people pay professionals for is their experience, their ability, and their assurance that hazards otherwise encountered by amateurs will be virtually non-existent.

Such cases include accidentally cutting electrical wires or breaking pipes when digging a trench or posting fences, cracked foundations and tiles as a result of amateur floor-tiling, complete or partial structure collapse, deterioration, or simple code-violations when remodeling (commercial and residential), even damaging extraneous property or compromising cement integrity when breaking concrete, which was my job for a few months.

I'm not trying to scare anyone away from learning these trades, but I will say that if you do attempt this kind of serious labor, it's best to consult a professional in that particular field. You shouldn't have to fall through a roof and break an arm so that it occurs to you that maybe patching up the roof and replacing those shingles yourself wasn't such a good idea, or worth the end-cost.

08.28.09

@randy,

It's in the New England Journal Of Medicine's most recent edition under "literary devices used to illustrate an idea". The emphasis of the publication was on inserting a joke to make sure it's understood the phrase is not meant to be scientific.

08.29.09

"Studies have also shown that your standard of living doesn't change dramatically once you make $40k a year. To see a marked improvement in your lifestyle only comes once you make enough money to have your own private jet. Everything in the middle of $40k & "jet money" is basically the same in terms of life satisfaction and happiness."

Please cite some of these studies.

I do think "standard of living" increases dramatically as you make more and I also think happiness increases until the point you can best fulfill your needs including emotional validation.

Just look at courtship alone. Making $100k vs. $40k vastly increases the number of women willing to give me serious credence as a mate. So if you're speaking only to material possessions there may be portions of truth but money opens doors in all arenas and that can significantly increase happiness.

Another point about these 'studies' is that they're looking short term. If I make $100k a year I may actually be less happy than at $40k (it could be harder, more hours, etc.) but I will likely retire earlier which may (should) result in far greater happiness. (And that knowledge alone will can certainly make me happier short term.)

I think certainty informs happiness.

08.29.09

You say "who is willing to pay you the extra $30 for the extra hour" but that's a bad assumption because the question really is "How much would someone have to pay you to work, or stay awake, or not play with kids, or spend time with family, for that extra hour." and that answer is very likely to be more than $30.

08.29.09

"The emphasis of the publication was on inserting a joke to make sure it's understood the phrase is not meant to be scientific."

I don't understand what phrase you're claiming was a joke.

08.29.09

And that is why you fail.

08.29.09

New England Journal Of Medicine's
Volume 361 — August 27, 2009 — Number 9

Nothing there about literary devices.

Got Something To Say?

Got Something To Say?

You Must Be Logged In To Comment
Not a Member? Brazen Careerist is a career management tool for next-generation professionals. Set up a free account today to comment on this post and start sharing your ideas. Learn more.

Network Roulette

Schedule an Event
images[1].jpg
2462908-LETS_GO_HOKIES-Blacksburg.jpg
chef_muppet.jpg
best-cell-phone-plans.gif

Ask A Citi Recruiter Zone

Q: I'm trying to change careers by leveraging my skills ... (More...)
A: Hi Dean: Tramyra just posted a similar question, and you ... (More...)

Jobs

  • Page 1 of 3
Content Affiliations Associate - 162806
Newark - Amazon
Content Creation Supervisor - 162810
Newark - Amazon
Assistant Audio Mastering Engineer - 162816
Newark - Amazon
Financial Analyst - 162922
Jersey City - Amazon
Account Manager - DEFL117247
Wall Township - Safeway Inc

Employer? Post a job