Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
I've been reading a lot that having a specialty or a niche is very important. The idea is to be an expert or the top candidate in your field so you become the "go to" person. The last thing you should want is to be good at everything because then you aren't really good at any one thing.
My first job after college was working for a Chairman/CEO. And then I got laid off in a merger. However, even after the first CEO I was pegged as "the assistant to CEOs." So be warned - often unfairly, the first job you take out of college becomes your specialty.
After I was laid off I of course had to go look for another job. I was called in for an interview at an agency and it was the assistant that did all the vetting of the candidates. The executive basically yelled at me for showing up for the interview because he wasn't a CEO and he thought it was absurd that I would even show up for a non-CEO executive assistant position. It was a horrible experience because I waited for an hour to see him and the entire "interview" lasted about 5 minutes.
Originally, my logic to becoming an executive assistant was it was a great job, there are tons of assistants so I should always have a job, and I enjoyed the work. In hindsight, there was fault in my thinking.
1) I wanted to work in the entertainment industry which really only exists in Los Angeles or New York. I already lived in New York and it wasn't for me. So that leaves Los Angeles.
2) Now that I'm job hunting again my biggest obstacle is HR or executives see not working for a CEO is a step down for me even though I don't see it that way. I didn't choose to be an assistant to CEOs. My first two jobs found me and I went on to work for a 3rd CEO. It's been a great resume booster to work for 3 CEOs but that also meant there are only so many CEOs that I could work for, especially in the entertainment industry. All my jobs have been with major corporations or conglomerates which also means only so many exist in the world and also in Los Angeles/entertainment industry.
3) By nature, being a good executive assistant means you're good at admin work. But admin work is very vague - phones, travel, calendar, expense reports, etc. So really, being a good executive assistant translates to being good with people and having great soft skills which is also not specific. So that really comes down to, I'm good at being what you need me to be, which isn't a specialty at all.
So, I kinda fell into what I did and went with it, for better or for worse. However, I am noticing a trend in all the people who headhunt me.
- I can work for any C-level executive or an executive who has very high-profile clients.
- Despite having zero experience in other fields, I've been offered other jobs as I've proven I can hit the ground running and learn as I go.
- Hiring managers know I can work with anyone and deal with anyone because CEOs interact with all levels of seniority, various professions, and a wide array of personalities.
- They also know I understand office politics, have basic business acumen, and keep things confidential because I wasn't a personal assistant or an assistant working out of someone's house.
- If I can handle the fast pace, urgent deadlines, and ever-changing priorities of the entertainment industry, I can probably handle anything.
I've never regretted any of the career decisions I've made. I'll also be able to transition to other industries if I choose to or explore other positions. Nothing is set in stone so don't worry if you may feel your specialty might be too specific as well.
I know where you're coming from. I'm in accounting, and the my first job out of college was for a public accounting firm. I was assigned to work in the Real Estate group for a manager that did primarily tax. Now that I'm in a new city looking for a new position, the recruiters I speak to want to match me up with people exclusively in the real estate industry or in heavy tax work. That's all well and good, but I can't help but feel this rules out a lot of positions I'd do very well at.
I agree that highlighting the transferable skills you picked up while working for your CEO will help you out. For me, (I think) that means highlighting my flexibility, my general accounting knowledge gained at the last job, and the ability to get things in under deadline. Those skills are in demand anywhere, I hope.
we've all been conditioned to think linearly about our careers because everyone is supposed to have a career - it's not really acceptable to just have a 'job' that you like to do and you can move laterally from one department to another or one firm to another. It's definitely a change of culture thing that people will get eventually.
I would say that you should insist on doing work that you like to do and focus on skills that are transferable rather than accept the straight career path that you've been put into :-) If push comes to shove then you can always claim that it's a career change.
The question I'd ask is "what jobs are you applying for?"
From this post, I am guessing that you're applying to assistant jobs. If that's the case, then, yes, I think your specialty is too narrow.
I think it's great that you've worked for C-levels. I think that's an asset. However, if you have your heart set in the entertainment industry, I'd start looking at what roles, besides assistants, you could be within that industry, using the skills you have. Otherwise, like you say, there are only so many C-levels to be an executive assistants to.
Unfortunately, people do think that your career has to make sense. They understand that every job is two way. You should be gaining something, while they are gaining your skills. So, unless it make sense for your career or the job is building your skills somehow, they can only think that you're in it for the money... not committed to the career. Therefore, without a career goal, you would jump ship when the next higher paying job come around. Do you have a succinct answer to address this? If so, I'm sure there is a way to mitigate the concern somehow, either via cover letter, or resume objective, or the likes.
Jeanie,
For the most part, I am aiming for EA jobs and have broadened it to include basically any admin job such as an office manager or coordinator.
I do agree that jobs should work both ways. :) I should learn something and the company should gain a good worker!
Regarding jumping ship for more money - my answer to that is this: Work/life balance is more important to me than money. I've actually been turning down positions that paid well, but meant I was on call 24/7. Smart companies and bosses know work/life balance is vital and even encourage it.
I think you bring up great points that will also help others in the community!
Thx!