
The hottest buzzword surrounding Gen Y in Canadian media this summer has to be “funemployed.” That is, choosing to be unemployed to do things they’ve always wanted to do, such as travel, pursue hobbies and, if the mainstream media would have you believe it, move back in with Mom and Dad to have a riotous time sitting on the couch and watching TV all day.
These articles paint twentysomething students and recent grads, and even unemployed workers in their mid-to-late 30s, as idealistic slackers without a care in the world who – for a time – surf couches, take odd jobs and, God forbid, actually feel optimistic about the future while they’re doing it.
Indeed, the trend is spurred on by changing attitudes towards work, says Karyn Gordon, a workplace and youth consultant. Young people today are less likely to see work as their raison d’être. They are happier to stay jobless because they don’t base their self worth on their job, Dr. Gordon says. [The Globe and Mail]
While this is generally true, many of us still long for a life-long career we are happy in. Unlike our parents’ and grandparents’ generations, who often stayed at one job or only a couple similar jobs their whole lives, perhaps it’s not the individual jobs that make up an important part of who we are. After all, we’re likely to change jobs at least a dozen or so times in our lifetime. But I think a meaningful career that progresses steadily from Point A to B to C, etc. is still important to Gen Y. We want to know our dedication and hard work is paying off in the long run.
Although I usually favour the Globe over other Canadian publications, its article on this topic doesn’t hold up to the paper’s normally high standards. It focuses on Gen Y’s stereotypical Peter Pan-ishness (however, most of the sources in this article are in their 30s for some reason) and doesn’t acknowledge the fact that young people currently have a lot of competition for jobs due to the recession, and there is also currently more reliance on short-term contract work which might leave people unemployed, then employed and then un/underemployed again.
Now, aside from the fact that I know more people who are working hard (or at least working hard at trying to get a job so they can work hard) than not, in previous generations the “funemployed” were simply free spirits who needed a little extra time to “find themselves.” Weren’t they? I don’t think this is something new nor do I think the funemployed should define our entire generation.
In the more recent Maclean’s article on the same topic, I think the reality of Gen Y not being able to find meaningful work and pursuing other valid options is more accurately represented. For example:
Although the article is still peppered with a few Gen Y stereotypes, it’s much more kind than the other. And as for our generation being more accepted of unemployment than previous generations, let’s just say we realize there are different paths we can take along the journey toward a fulfilling career. Sometimes it includes travel (for business or for pleasure), or exploring different interests, or just being unemployed for a while because it can be tough to find a job.
And it’s OK!
(However, I have to mention that I think time off should include something that is potentially relevant to your career path, such as volunteering/unpaid internships or creating work for yourself through some sort of project or even just a blog.)

I wonder if any of the "funemployed" have student loans? Are they defaulting on the payments? I also wonder if the "funemployed" would be enjoying life so much if not for government unemployment benefits? Seems to me, they're enjoying retirement before they've earned it.
@Kimberley:
While I do think one probably has to be fairly privileged to become "funemployed," I don't think it's necessarily restricted to not working for an extended period of time. From what I understand, some work odd jobs that have nothing to do with their career, others volunteer, some try to start businesses, etc.
I'm sure there are some who do absolutely nothing and collect employment insurance, but I think those people are called just plain "unemployed" and not "funemployed."
I could be thinking of funemployment in a more positive light than some would, however.

"Funemployed" - that's what I did college. Older generations complain that Gen. Y was handed too many things by overbearing, enabling parents aka the soccermom.
For some people, this becomes the result.
I absolutely love this post, and I am confused about "funemployment."
Is the unemployed person who volunteers in their industry (and does because he/she enjoys it) on LESS of a "funemployment" than somebody who takes an "oddjob" for extra cash during their unemployment?
It sounds like there's a confusion between two types of people here: those who are ACTIVELY having fun (ie- doing something they enjoy, fulfilling a need for themselves, enriching their lives-- however that may be), and people who are doing nothing (the couch potato)...but I think that grouping those who "surf couches, take odd jobs and, God forbid, actually feel optimistic about the future while they’re doing it" is really confused (sounds like the articles, not you).
I think the first person fits your quotation about self-worth not coming directly from a job (Great quote!) And I think that there is something to be said for those who can turn a not-so-great situation into an avenue for fulfilling a personal need. I don't think it's fair to assume that, if these people don't have jobs, they don't have lives or are lazy.
I think the second person may not rank themselves as high on self-worth (I'd be interested in reading more about the thoughts of this guy/gal), but if he IS a product of our generation, I hope he lays on his parents' couch long enough to figure out whatever he needs to figure out in order to stand up and say, "that's enough. I'm going to change my life." It's a free world out there, and you only live once-- whether you have a job or not.
I will step off of the soapbox now. Great, thought provoking post!