Where ambitious young professionals connect and grow

Already a member?

Click here to login

Welcome to Brazen Careerist!

Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.

  
Posted On 04.03.09

I’ve been trying to figure out how to write this blog post for quite some time now.  I think I finally know how to best share these thoughts.

Having spent 2.5 years at the University of Iowa and now 1.5 years at Drake University I have had the opportunity to see many different perspectives on education from both a public & private school.  Here is what I’ve found is wrong with our education system and what’s forced it to be this way.

  • Textbooks:  That’s right, textbooks have ruined the way we are taught.  I look at like this.  Universities and schools everywhere have been using textbooks for centuries.  Those that are “experts” in their field write down what they know, usually copying formats and theories of past textbooks, and then selling them for an obscenely high price.  What’s wrong with this?  Things have changed in the last few centuries.  We are in the information age.  I can go and find all of the information in any of my textbooks online for free and it isn’t that hard to do so.  Textbooks are a crux for the teachers/professors and students.  It holds us back because few of Gen X and most of Gen Y don’t learn this way.
  • The PhD Professor:  There is nothing wrong with a professor who has gone to school to earn a Doctorates degree.  That said, there is everything wrong that Universities employ individuals with these higher degrees yet NO experience in the real world.  This is ridiculous, especially in the business school setting.  One thing I loved about the University of Iowa is that all of my entrepreneurship professors were not in fact professors.  They were retired individuals both young and old who have found great success in the business world and want to share that with the rest of us.
  • Regurgitation versus Applications: When I sit back and think of all the bubble sheets I’ve filled over the last four years I think of all the time I’ve wasted cramming the night before memorizing definitions and theory concepts verbatim.  I, myself, test well.  I do well on multiple choice because often, I can deduce the correct answer.  If you asked me the question without multiple options there is no way I would ever get the answer right.  Why am I paying tuition so a teacher can only test me and my classmates on how well we regurgitate information.
  • Babysitting: Seriously.  We are in college.  We do not need our hands held to guide us through to our careers.  Drake University is notorious (in my mind) for doing this.  I was a Senior at U of Iowa and transferred to Drake.  This added a semester on before I could graduate, which is okay because I was going to finish a semester early at U or Iowa.  I have been forced to take a couple entry level courses.  In these courses they tell me what I’m supposed to do to find internships, network, and prepare for my career.  Great, right?  No.  In these classes they also require me to read these stupid books that teach me nothing.  They make me go to internship fairs, career fairs, etc.  If you aren’t doing these things they are on you because in their eyes, you can’t fail.  It’s not bad to care about your students but it is ultimately the choice of the student to be successful and you can’t shove that down their throats.

These are the things I think have ruined our system, aside from the government subsidizing stupidity and artificially driving the costs of education higher; but that’s a post for another day.

Here are the things we need to change if we want this to turn around:

  • Experiential Learning: Universities nation wide should have clinics in all of their schools.  Especially in a business school.  Clinics provide students the opportunity to network, build mentoring relationships, get real world experience, and earn credit at the same time.  Close the textbooks.  It will save your students money and they will learn more.
  • Pull Away from Academics: This is really focused on business schools but I’m sure it applies to any degree at the University level.  Go ahead and hire individuals with higher degrees, but require real world experience.  So it may hurt your rankings because you aren’t hiring the top PhD from Harvard that’s never had a real job.  So what!  It’s about the students, not your rankings.  Bring the community into the classroom.
  • Let Us Fail if We Want to Fail: Don’t waste your time babying individuals.  Even if you help them graduate and do well in college, how does this prepare them for the real world.  If I hired someone that needed this babying I would fire them in an instant, no questions asked.  Work with students, but don’t try and hold their hands.
  • Test on Application: Few business people can repeat definitions.  Why should student have to?  It’s not about memorizing and regurgitating.  It’s about learning concepts and knowing how to apply them.  Essay tests and individual/group projects do this.  Don’t give us T/F, multiple choice, or matching tests.  This is stupid.  Test us on what we’ve learned.

Until these changes are universally made in the US our education system will continue to suffer and the quality of our graduating students will be decreasing at significant rates.  Some of these changes are difficult to make.  If you have questions let us know because we know steps need to be taken.  If you have a student in your home or if you are a student, demand these things from your/their professors.  Until this happens I doubt any change will be made.

Share and Enjoy:

Comments

Zee
04.03.09

I'm not in business school, but I'm in the education field and working on a PhD and I completely agree. I don't even like textbooks in the k-12 grades. Students should be reading books not summaries of information. Tests are useful in some occasions but when I ask my students about information they did a project on 3 years ago versus take a test, they can always remember the information from the project. Finally "real world" experience should be require before entering any PhD program. I see too many people with no idea what is available to them or how to conduct themselves in a professional situation.

katenonymous
04.03.09

I think you have some good points here, but they'd be stronger if your details were right. Let's take a look at the question of textbooks.

First, they haven't "'ruined' the way you were taught." I think what you mean to say is that you think they're not an effective teaching tool, or that they encourage too many limitations, or something else entirely. Maybe you mean that they've ruined teaching. But your sentence as is just doesn't work. You've had textbooks throughout your education; they aren't some new introduction in college that "ruined" what went before.

Second, your use of quotes ("experts") can appear condescending. The people who write textbooks generally are experts. You may wish many of them had a different kind of expertise--indeed, that clearly is the thrust of your next bullet point--but they do have knowledge and experience that you lack. And are dismissing out of hand with those quotation marks.

Third, "things have changed in the last few centuries." True. But first, textbooks have been around for less than two, and second, the changes you're talking about are still measured in decades.

Fourth, "Textbooks are a crux for the teachers/professors and students." Based on context, I think you mean "crutch."

I do think you make some good points here: I agree that application results in better critical thinking skills than does recitation of facts. I agree that--particularly for professional schools--it makes sense to have instructors who have hands-on experience. I agree that college students should succeed or fail on the merits of their own work and initiative; it's one thing to provide resources, and make sure people know how to use them, and another to "hand-hold" throughout the process when that isn't needed.

I'm not sure that these points hold up across the university without exception, though, and I think the lack of precision in your supporting arguments limits their effectiveness.

04.03.09

Good thoughts, Steve. I am an Iowa alumnus who started out at Creighton, but also didn't get along well with the kind of babysitting you received at Drake. Some people like it. Some don't. I know graduates from both who are super-successful, and others who are...not so much.

I agree with your points about essays and projects. Now, that I've been working for a while, what I have found valuable about the multiple choice tests is that they gave me a broad foundation of knowledge. Projects let you dig deep and really own a concept (which I love), but they do tend to limit your exposure to other potentially relevant concepts that you might want to dig into one future day. A combination of both is probably best.

What I think is fatally absent from college curriculum is nuts and bolts workplace skills. I learned all about management theory and strategy in college, but had no clue how to craft a professional email or about how to generally NOT look like a knucklehead in front of people 20 years my senior. This has nothing to do with intelligenc or knowledge. If you're like me when I was in school you're thinking "I'm great with people, that won't be a problem for me." That was partially true. But I also had way more lessons to learn about this than I imagined.

04.03.09

My school has a fairly good PR program (my major), but there are a few class that have left something to be desired.

I agree with your point about textbooks. More than half of the books I've purchased, I've hardly ever opened. I think professors should make them optional if they aren't going to require us to use the information in the book. (For example, my biology class had an expensive book that I never used because the professor gave us worksheets.)

I also agree with several of your other points. Professors should have experience, not just degrees. Depending on your field of study, real world application is better than memorization and regurgitation. In one of my favorite PR classes, we chose a local business/organization to do all of our PR work for during the semester. That was nice--I learned more doing real-world work.

Lastly, I completely agree with your point about babysitting. The real world doesn't hold your hand while you figure things out. Colleges shouldn't do that either.

Amy
04.03.09

I couldn't agree more with your point about babysitting students. I am appalled by the changes in our education system over the past few decades. The first time I went to college was in the '80s. I got a BS in chemistry and worked my butt off. A few years ago I went back for a BS in microbiology. I can't believe how much easier it was. I hardly had to study at all. The teachers were more worried about to not letting anyone fail that they didn't challenge the rest of the students. And what's with open-book tests? That doesn't show how much you know, just that you know how to look it up. It was pathetic.

The reading level of the textbooks was ridiculous. I read more dificult texts in high school. Maybe you wouldn't think textbooks ruined things if you would have had to read some that were actually written at a college reading level.

I partially disagree with your point regarding instructors having field experience rather than a PhD. I agree that there are too many profs out there with no real world experience. But one thing field experience doesn't teach you is how to teach.

Got Something To Say?

Got Something To Say?

You Must Be Logged In To Comment
Not a Member? Brazen Careerist is a career management tool for next-generation professionals. Set up a free account today to comment on this post and start sharing your ideas. Learn more.

Network Roulette

Schedule an Event

Ask A Citi Recruiter Zone

Q: I'm trying to change careers by leveraging my skills ... (More...)
A: Hi Dean: Tramyra just posted a similar question, and you ... (More...)

Jobs

  • Page 1 of 3
Content Affiliations Associate - 162806
Newark - Amazon
Content Creation Supervisor - 162810
Newark - Amazon
Assistant Audio Mastering Engineer - 162816
Newark - Amazon
Financial Analyst - 162922
Jersey City - Amazon
Account Manager - DEFL117247
Wall Township - Safeway Inc

Employer? Post a job