Already a member?

Click here to login

Welcome to Brazen Careerist!

Raven Moore is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Raven Moore and other professionals just like you. Learn more.

Posted On 01.13.09

1. When an entire department is on vacation or during the major holiday season

If the salaried employees can’t be bothered to be there, why should the temp? Once, I was supposed to cover for two admins that were on vacation during Christmas. The agency asked me to work the day before Christmas Eve and the day after Christmas.

Ok, that’s fine. But get this: the entire department was gone as well. Actually, not the entire department, just the director of operations, the office manager, all support staff for both floors, the managing directors and the consultants - not to mention, the lights were on weekend timers.

Needless to say, even if I could find another soul in that place (and I did) - none of them could give me work to do. There was nothing I could do. But, the guilt goes away fast. You get some cash in your pocket, at the expense of a disorganized manager.

2. To help someone else with work they were hired to do in the first place

If you need to hire a temp so that someone can catch up on their job tasks - something is seriously wrong. Most likely, this person has too heavy of a workload. Or, they’re an incompetent employee. Or (scarily) both. Either way, it costs businesses money. Hiring a temp to help someone do work that only one person was hired (and needs) to do is a sad case of mismanagement and wasted company funds.

Years ago, the office manager at a company I worked for hired a temp to cover the phones while the receptionist sat in a cube. The receptionist supposedly used this time to catch up on her administrative duties. On the surface, it just seems odd. If you probe even deeper, it just gets stupid. If you are going to outsource someone else’s (current) job, wouldn’t it make more sense to have them perform the “cheaper” portion of it?

You probably wonder what that means.

In reality, it costs more to have a temp answer phones (per hour on average) than it does to have them do data entry at a desk (especially when it takes the same amount of time to train). Also, you’re aren’t doing your business any favors when you pull maneuvers like that in the name of “efficiency.”

3. You are overwhelmed with “outstanding projects”

Outstanding projects are business wild cards. You have the idea that the work should’ve been done. But, it wasn’t. Now, it’s collecting dust. And perhaps, we (the business) should pay attention to it now (for whatever reason).

The projects become outstanding because they fall out everyone’s primary job description. You know how it goes, “I don’t do that, Pete does that!” “Well, I used to do that, but my boss says it’s not my job,” blah blah blah. You know the drill.

As a amanager, you can stick it to some hapless soul and make it part of their job description. Nevertheless, it sounds like you may need to create a new job position within your company. For the sake of employee morale and efficiency, hiring a temp to take over tasks that are too time consuming for one person to do is the best use of time and money for any company.

4. When someone quits unexpectedly or you haven’t hired anyone yet for a job vacancy

This is a perfect opportunity for managers to evaluate if the position needs to be filled, eliminated or rewritten. Some companies take the cheap (and most inefficient) route. Managers lodge additional job duties onto other employees to pick up slack. Unfortunately, business suffers in the long run when employees have to deal with handling two jobs instead of one (in the long term).

Not only will you have cranky employees (who question your management skills), but you will have to deal with confused clients and a medley of whining complaints thinly disguised as “concerns.”

After a few weeks, if you don’t expect to promote or hire anyone soon, it’s your best bet to have a temp come in.

Share and Enjoy:

Comments

Editor's Note: Inappropriate comments that are offensive to the author or not in context to the author's post will be removed. For editorial feedback, please contact our Community Manager through his user profile. Click here.
Renee
January 13, 2009 12:22 pm

I'm glad SOMEBODY recognizes this! My boss does this ALL THE TIME. And he doesn't just hire temps. He hires expensive consultants. There are always at least four of them around, usually more, in a department of 20 full-time people. They take up 40% of our yearly budget.

Here's what happens:
- Boss gets project
- Boss realizes he has no idea what this project is about
- Boss realizes admitting this will expose the fact that he has no right being in this position
- Boss hires consultant to do the work for him (even though consultant doesn't know the company at all, screwing up the project further)
- Boss releases consultant once project is done, and takes credit for consultant's work.

So you end up with a botched project and a guy hanging onto a position he really shouldn't have.

Raven
January 13, 2009 12:44 pm

Oh my, sounds like someone doesn't know how to do their job. Eventually, upper management will notice this (b/c they'll get tired of wasting money) and figure out your boss doesn't know what he's doing.

The Office Newb
January 13, 2009 3:21 pm

I wish you had written this 6 months ago so I could show it to my boss!

My company is a huge offender of #3. They decide to do a project, not an important project, just something they want to accomplish so they can say they accomplished something. Once it's determined how long a project would take using current staff--which is always longer than the project manager wants because, hello!, some of us actually have work to do other than come up with useless projects--someone suggests bringing in temps.

This all fine and dandy except my company also suffers from the "well if one temp can do it in x time, 3 temps could do it in 1/3x time, so let's hire 3 temps!!!" Sometimes they don't even know what they want to hire temps for, they just know they got approved to fund 3 temps and don't want to "waste" their budget allocation.

Seriously?!

Raven
January 13, 2009 3:45 pm

That's hilarious. I've been on both sides of the fence and could never understand why companies would fill cubicles up with temps to do projects that need to be scrapped or are a waste of time in the first place. Companies think that b/c it's cheap labor, they're getting more bang for their buck. In actuality, they're wasting time and money.

Bukky
January 13, 2009 10:19 pm

It's so hard to find a temp job out in NYC because they all say they don't have anything and when they send you on a job, you end up stuffing envelopes and it only lasts about one or two days...

Bukky
January 13, 2009 10:32 pm

I am looking for temporary agencies that are good for a recent grad to apply to...which ones are the best in your opinion? thanks.

Would going to see a recruiter be a better bet?

Raven
January 14, 2009 7:19 am

@Bukky
Short term assignments are good for the temp (especially new grads) who are looking to get their feet wet and check out various companies and industries. Long term temp assignments can be a crap shoot.

If you are looking for long term temp work (and nothing else), LT assignments are a great.

If you are looking for permanent job and the client company is making no noise about wanting to hire you for the work that's being done, two things are happening 1)they're too cheap to directly hire you (b/c they would have to pay the agency a fee) 2)the work you are doing has no permanent position behind it and they're getting cheap labor in the long run, why hire you for that? or 3)they're too disorganized to effectively manage their own workflow

Raven
January 14, 2009 7:25 am

@Bukky
I totally forgot to answer your other question. Depending on the type of work you want to do, contacting a recruiter is your best bet. Some agencies only concentrate on financial industries, IT companies, or creative work (even ones that concentrate on NPOs).

You can do a quick search to find out about those types of staffing firms in your area.
I wouldn't say one is better over the over, since I'm not that familiar with the NYC staffing firms. In general, you should look for a staffing firm that does direct hire and temp staffing.

Also, register at more than one staffing agency to increase your chances of getting an assignment. Be honest about what you want. Good luck - keep me posted on your progress!

mack
February 11, 2009 2:26 am

does anybody no of legal time limit on temp to hire? im caught up in a staffing company thats keeping temps for 5 years plus something isnt right but i cant find anything on staffing ageny laws in NC?

February 11, 2009 7:42 am

That doesn't make any sense. Staffing agencies (generally) don't "keep" people, especially if you mean they insist you only work for them for 5 years. If you mean that they still keep your name on payroll, or as a conatct for temp work - that's normal. Staffing agencies are usually defined as contracting agencies. Essentially, you're a freelancer and you're contracted to work for the staffing agency (meaning, the provide you with the work for a certain period of time). Take a look at your particular staffing agency's policies and see how they are defined. That would be a good place to start if you want to know how they work.

mack
February 11, 2009 1:26 pm

well raven more i understand that on the policy end but im looking for a federal law explanation because this company is exploiting people who had minor offenses in the 1980s in the nature of trespassing charges publice intoxications etc. we were all told that we had to go through the staffing agency if we wanting to be considered full time. in my specific case i put an application in may of last year and did not recieve a chance to work until oct of last year and i am still being held on a temporary status a 20 year old underqualified kid that i cant see how he got a highschool education received a full time job with in 7 days of working as a temp. I am a disabled veteran with degrees and certificated and well experience in what i do thats the situation aside from the policy

February 11, 2009 6:50 pm

@mack
I didn't mean to come across as brusque. But, to me, it sounds like discrimination - and all companies (as I'm sure you know) cannot "legally" discriminate against based on what you've described.

When you say you didn't receive a chance to work - does that mean you were not "allowed" to work or the staffing agency didn't have work available for you until October? Also, temp agencies with direct-hire divisions shouldn't (as normal policy)say you have to sign up for temp work if you only want to be considered for full time work.

Also, perhaps, the agency that you are working with may not have access to the type of work you are qualifed/experienced to do. I would switch agencies, or find another one at the very least. Staffing agencies are held under the same laws as other "mainstream" corporations, so if you think they are discriminating against you, they probably are.

Got Something To Say?

Got Something To Say?

You Must Be Logged In To Comment
Not a Member? Brazen Careerist is a career management tool for next-generation professionals. Set up a free account today to comment on this post and start sharing your ideas. Learn more.

Today's Top Idea


Don’t judge based on popularity or blind reciprocity, instead make sure they “get it” and just as importantly, that their followers “get it”. More...

Brenton Gieser

images[1].jpg
marketresearch.jpg
nih_300.gif
mobile-sites-mobile-seo1.jpg

Grad School Zone

ScottShrum.jpg
Scott Shrum

Today is one of those extra exciting days at Veritas Prep HQ, when GMAT prep classes start in dozens of cities worldwide

U.S. Department of State...
Health Practitioner - For...
Facility Manager - Foreig...
Citigroup, Inc.
Proposal Writer — Cash ...
Business Banking Relation...
Randstad
Staffing Consultant
Staffing Consultant
NBC Universal, Inc.
Social Media Developer, O...
Production Assistant...
X