Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
One of my biggest office pet peeves is dealing with co-workers who come into the office sick. This is partly because I’ve dealt with not one, but two bouts of something akin to the black plague (which I caught both times from a sick co-worker) and partly because it just irks me that people
I agree with Rebecca - something in the middle sure would be nice. It's ridiculous that I'm leading six conference calls without a voice, or that I'm deducted 2.5 hours of sick leave for leaving at 2:30 because I'm sick.
And don't get me started on presenteeism. I had a coworker who showed up every day, sick, well, whatever, no vacation ever, and gave me every sickness his toddler got. All because the boss could say, "Well, John's here every day!"

This is one of those topics that can go a lot of ways for me.
I've been pretty lucky. I've had jobs for the last decade where I've always had plenty of sick time and vacation time to use when I needed it. I am also fortunate in that I don't get sick often. It would be very nice if that were a luxury afforded more people in the United States.
On the other hand, there are a lot of jobs where you have the sick time, but using it is a bad idea. If you're a member of a production environment or call center (as I was for many years) you may have sick days, but be severely penalized for using them. Calling in sick (even with a doctors note) can hurt your performance metrics, affect your bonus, and cause you to lose your job. It's the same thing in retail all over the country. As long as people stand to risk losing their jobs for taking sick time, they're going to do anything they can to not take it.
I'm in the very interesting situation of being in the office sick today, so this was very topical for me. I'm on the tail end of a head & chest cold that laid me out for about four days. I started coming down with it Thursday. On Friday I worked from home (from bed actually) because I deemed it a bad idea to try and leave the house. I have a rather unpleasant sore throat and a bit of a cough, but the worst of it is very over.
I understand peoples concern over not wanting to get sick, and I know some people do get sick very easily. (I'm fortunately one of those people that just doesn't seem to catch most things easily.) I'm not in the office because I am toughing it our or because I don't want to use my sick time (which isn't even a concern). I'm in the office because I have work that needs to be done, and I can't do it effectively from home. (Some things I can, but what I need to do right now means I need to be here.)
So while I respect peoples desire not to get sick, I also have to respect my employer and job and make the right choices. If I had scarlet fever or Pnemonia I'd stay home. A bit of a cough? Not so much.
I also won't take responsibility for your wellness. Everyone has a different immune system and the ability to handle bugs and illnesses. If you know that you're susceptible to getting sick easily it's your responsibility to take adequate precautions. Keep a bottle of Vitamin C in your desk, along with some Cold-eez. Exercise and eat foods that boost your immune system. Consume less products that make you susceptible. Consistent use of any treatment for an illness creates systemic dependency and makes it more likely for you to get sick again, because your immune system has not properly dealt with the bug.
Reading this, especially in the comments, brought to mind a lot of the general point behind the book "Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It". Basically, a lot of the root cause is that we are judged on time and results, not just results. Hell, in some cases it seems like people are only judged on time and not results at all.
But if we remove time from that equation, so statements like 'I had a coworker who showed up every day, sick, well, whatever, no vacation ever, and gave me every sickness his toddler got. All because the boss could say, "Well, John's here every day!"' and 'Calling in sick (even with a doctors note) can hurt your performance metrics, affect your bonus, and cause you to lose your job. It's the same thing in retail all over the country. As long as people stand to risk losing their jobs for taking sick time, they're going to do anything they can to not take it.' are no longer relevant, I think we'd hit two things.
1) We'd get rid of the dead weight of people who are just showing up and collecting a paycheque and flying under the radar; and
2) People would be able to make the proper arrangements to get their work done in advance of deadlines, which could actually mean taking a few days to recover and then being able to work at 100% productivity rather than 20% because they really should have been at home resting.
Having worked for my entire career to date in London, I can confirm that there are far too many English people who literally treat sick leave as holiday!
Memorable moments for me include a colleague who called in sick due to a mouth ulcer (apparently affecting her ability to talk) and one who was just "too tired" to work!
It's a combination of attitude and bad management. Get these two right and I'm sure that companies could be flexible with the sick leave they allow.

Becky,
I agree with you. People who use sick days for stupid reasons tend to give the rest of the workforce a bad name. But Adam brings the focus to the really important point.
The amount of time I spend in the office has no direct value-relation to the company (except in situations such as call-centers, or retail cashiers). The vast majority of jobs, particularly of office jobs and professions, can eliminate the idea of sick-time entirely. Make the positions salaried and base the employees performance on whether or not their job was done well. Then if said person doesn't want to come in because they're tired (and I won't lie, I've done it. I've also taken my share of mental health days.) they don't have to. They just have to make sure their work is done. That may mean asking a coworker to handle that one urgent thing and working longer the next day to make up for it. Whatever.
The point is that we have this concept that we pay people for their time. And that's stupid. We should be paying people for the work they do.

But the work you do might change at the last moment, and if you're not there, the work might not get done.
I'm not interested in working with or employing people who are so ruled by their moods that they won't abide by the commitment they made when they accepted the job. Not showing up because you don't "feel like it" is very childish. Letting your love life or lack thereof impact your work is immature. If you're so grief-stricken you can't function, take a personal or vacation day.
I think Marciela has a good point about personal days. I use personal days when I need to take a mental health day. I happen to work at a US company that has unlimited sick days. I'm not sure how many the average person uses but I can say its no where close to how many Europeans would use.
I only use sick days when I have to stay home and can't work at all. Unfortunately even when sick I found myself checking e-mail and responding to questions. But that's just the American way. Some of us just work non-stop, especially when multiple time zones are involved. Whether we have more or fewer sick days, there is no stopping us.

Maricela makes a strong point about the changeability of many of our jobs. Unfortunately, for the vast majority of jobs in the US taking a personal or vacation day when you 'can't function' is the exact same thing as taking a sick day. I've never worked for an employer who differentiated between sick and personal days. In truth, most of my employers have rolled sick days and vacation days into one large bank that the employee can use.
As far as the idea of being childish or immature, Maricela is very lucky to have the emotional fortitude to hold up very well under emotional pressures and show up to work no matter what's going on in her personal life. But the reason a person can't come into work isn't the issue here. The deplorable treatment of said person by their employer is. I know a woman who was fired because her son was in an accident at school and she had to leave immediately to go to the hospital.
On a personal level it all comes down to responsibility. I was sick enough last week that I didn't go into the office, but I spent a good portion of the day with my laptop in bed working over VPN. I didn't do this because I didn't want to use a sick day, but because I had a responsibility to get some stuff done and I wanted to live up to that. If you don't take responsibility for your job you aren't going to cut it, but I don't think that all jobs (or even most jobs) demand to the minute punctuality and 40 hours of face time every week. The fact that our employers focus so much on that is perhaps the most challenging part of work-life in the US.
Marciela, you do make a good point, but here's how I might respond.
You say we need to be there because something might change. Now, while I'd agree that being able to respond to business needs is a requirement regardless of whether you're paid for your time or your work, I would ask this follow up question.
Why did it change?
Frequently, (not always, but frequently) last minute changes are the result of poor planning or various team members leaving things to the last minute. And you know what, by being constantly physically available, we make it possible.
And I'd take that comment then into two directions.
1) If we're all being judged on results, and those results are based on clear expectations and timelines, then the work should be getting done when it needs to be, and if certain people are not pulling their weight, it becomes quite apparent. If the same last minute changes are always coming from the same source, management should notice this in a results-only environment.
2) Given the technological advantages we have today, why do we need to physically be in the office to deal with an urgent change? I have a laptop and a BlackBerry, so I can basically do my work anywhere I can get a cell signal. I think one of the best quotes from the book I mentioned above, and I'm paraphrasing somewhat because its been a month or two since I read it, is "Work becomes a thing you do, not a place you go."
To take their example even farther, they quoted a news story from approximately 2001 (I think) talking about the first National Work From Home Day. In this story, one of the lines said something along the lines of "Now you don't need to feel guilty about negotiating that multi-million dollar deal in your boxers from home." Um, maybe it's just me, but if you've just negotiated a multi-million dollar deal, why should anyone care what you were wearing or where you did it from?