Where ambitious young professionals connect and grow

Already a member?

Click here to login

Welcome to Brazen Careerist!

Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.

  
Posted On 08.12.08

I used to think it was just me who had the idea of being a “crazy cat lady” when I finally became an old spinster, but it turns out this is every independent woman’s dream.

Women: You may deny it, but every time you watch “Everybody Loves Raymond” or “King of Queens” or any other show that represents an unmotivated man married to a hot, successful woman, I know a part of you wants to hurry to the nearest alley to collect as many strays as can fit in your newly acquired shopping cart.

The question is, why does CBS and other networks try to sell this idea to the masses? Independent women being okay with, and even loving a man who’s only goal in life is to fart on his couch?

Answer: It’s all about the modern day witch hunt. To crush the witches by marrying them off to immature dunces.

Think about it: Back in the day, successful women were declared witches and then burned at the stake. And last time I checked, it was kind of illegal to call a woman a witch and then burn her at the stake. No matter if she’s made of wood or not. So what do we do?

We can pair her forever with dead weight. In the form of Kevin James. Perfect modern day handicapping of a woman who was really going to be somebody until she had to take care of her juvenile ball-and-chain.

Now, let me just say that I am nowhere near against marriage. I think there are some good men and women out there that can work well together to become successful people together and apart. But when sitcoms are bottling up the idea of men sitting back and letting their unhappy, overworked wives take charge of their lives, I say count me out of that love affair.

Yet, some women are buying it. If not in the CBS sitcom evening hour, then in fashion television.

I just got done watching a show entitled, “How Do I Look?” where a team of fashionable women picked on this hippy, dog-walker lady who everyone called “Crazy Linda.”

And why was she “crazy”?! Because she wore tie-dye. Apparently anyone who wears tie-dye is wearing the mark of insanity. Much as owning a cat is the mark of spinsterhood. All of which are the marks of witches.

The part that killed me about this “How Do I Look?” show was the fact that the only reason this woman wanted a makeover was because no man would give her a chance while she was in tie-dye.

As was dubbed the tag line for poor crazy Linda, “Will she drop her dated look for a chance at love or remain dateless?”

The point being: A man can find a hot, intelligent, successful woman while sitting in his underwear, complaining about not getting enough sex while “crazy Linda” can’t find one person interested in looking beyond a tie-dye shirt.

Modern day witch-hunt.

We may not identify our witches as those “pagan” women who are lighter than a duck, and able to float like wood (Monty Python, anyone? anyone?), but we do call them out on their love of tie-dye, fondness for cats and all things ceramic.

As a member of a new generation coming into power, I hope we teach our children that it’s okay to be a woman and not know a thing about fashion. To be a woman and not know how to put on make-up or have at least “five sure-fire ways to get rid of wrinkles.”

And above all, I hope we teach our children that being a man is nothing like being a Jim Belushi or Homer Simpson.

That we should all be exactly like Angela Lansbury and Dick Van Dyke. Because that was the true point of this post.

Share and Enjoy:

Comments

Scott M
08.12.08

Of course. Why should women change they way they look for men?

And why must men change for women?

Women complain about husbands who don't talk enough about their feelings, or are too involved with their work, or perhaps think about sex too often.

Why?

Because men are men. And women are women.

The point is that both sexes have certain tendencies. Men tend to put more emphasis on physical appearance early in a relationship. We are just wired that way. Yeah, in this enlightened age, we try to compensate. But that is our tendency. And women KNOW this, so they spend much more time on their appearance than men (on the average).

Of course, they have the right to demand that men realize they are more than just a pretty face. Just like men need to explain that sharing feelings is difficult, so it might take a bit more time to open up. Or that our jobs define us, so while will make room for family, much of our identity is tied up in our careers. Or that physical intimacy is how we feel close to our partner, so we might tend to focus on that a bit more.

But that old argument about the toliet seat? Just check it before you sit! Geez! :)

Holly Hoffman
08.12.08

Oh, man. You've got it. As to my feelings regarding women, marriage and motherhood as they relate to sitcoms, I say it all here.

And here is why successful women don't end up with their male-counterpart peers.

The point is that a man wrote the script. The larger portion of men can't deal with a successful woman, especially if she's smarter, more assertive, and more successful than he is. So, we're subjigated, just like you said, forced to play the straight man to an "entertainingly" hapless man who is waited on hand and foot (don't think I don't see who does all the cooking, CBS).

It's not just a matter of "men are from mars, women are from venus." This has to do with how men and women are dealing with a relatively new (within the past 3 generations) phenomenon of the equally successful female. It creates a power struggle. There's only so much time left at the end of a 10-hour workday. Who's doing the cooking, cleaning, care-taking? That's the shite work, whichever way you flip it over, and someone's got to do it. Thus, the power struggle.

This is a serious issue. How we are portrayed in popular culture is how we are perceived, not only to our peers, but to the next generation.

GenerationXpert
08.12.08

I don't know, I think they are JUST sitcoms. I'm successful. I make good money. I have a cool job. I have a masters degree. And so does my husband.

Most of my friends are in the same situation (birds of feather I guess).

I am 37. I grew up in the 80s during the whole "I am woman hear me roar" times. I think as successful women we need to look at our roll in our single status. Sometimes we tend to talk ourselves up a little too much. I wouldn't want a guy who does that, and I can't imagine a guy would want a woman who does that.

As women who came of age after Title IX, we have had a lot of pressure on us to lead and succeed. It some cases it seems that women have gone from being totally passive to being totally dominant in 30 years. Balance is the key. If you want a guy who respects your successes, you need to respect his.

theleftovers
08.12.08

@ Scott: You say that men are men and women are women, but aren't we all just people? It sounds like you're buying into the stereotypes presented in these sitcoms by suggesting that men and women have these issues with each other.

@ GenerationXpert: Yes, they are just sitcoms, but if you've ever read the book "Sex, Drugs, and Cocoa Puffs," you'll know all about how the media plays on the minds of those who watch it.

And like you, I don't buy into those CBS scripts, but every day, I see people who do. And like Holly said, it's a serious issue in power struggles.

Parsing Nonsense
08.13.08

I have to say, I have trouble getting angry about the bumbling sitcom husbands and the backlash against tie-dye. Who's to say those successful and hot women aren't tickled to come home to a guy who's mastered the art of relaxing? Maybe they don't want to be married to guys who are chiseled objets d'art and who match them in every way (including ambition?)

Likewise with the tie-dye. It's atrocious. I wouldn't make fun of someone for wearing it but I certainly won't accuse guys of "witch hunting" because they don't want to date someone who doesn't care about her appearance.

Why does it make sense to insist that guys not be sitting and farting on their couches when you're all for forcing guys to be attracted to a woman who is not concerned about her appearance?

Melissa
08.14.08

Here is my take: The shows are on because people watch them. Period. The pendulum has swung to the far opposite side of the spectrum since the "father knows best" days of the 1950's and 60's. This has been ongoing for the last 20 years. The makeover shows are a sect of reality TV and are targeted to women viewers, so they generally focus on women.

Is it really a which hunt being condcuted by the mass media? Doubtful.

But at the same time is it healthy to be immersed in these broad steretypes? Also Doubtful.

Mass media is mass media and has been unfairly portraying the American Woman forever. Why? Because they still make money doing it.

Got Something To Say?

Got Something To Say?

You Must Be Logged In To Comment
Not a Member? Brazen Careerist is a career management tool for next-generation professionals. Set up a free account today to comment on this post and start sharing your ideas. Learn more.

Network Roulette

Schedule an Event
Logo-Chair-SMALL.jpg
BrazenCareristLogo.

Ask A Citi Recruiter Zone

Q: I'm trying to change careers by leveraging my skills ... (More...)
A: Hi Dean: Tramyra just posted a similar question, and you ... (More...)

Jobs

  • Page 1 of 3
Content Affiliations Associate - 162806
Newark - Amazon
Content Creation Supervisor - 162810
Newark - Amazon
Assistant Audio Mastering Engineer - 162816
Newark - Amazon
Financial Analyst - 162922
Jersey City - Amazon
Account Manager - DEFL117247
Wall Township - Safeway Inc

Employer? Post a job