Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
What is your guilty pleasure? Steak? Chocolate? Butter? No problem. You can turn each of these foods into a 99 percent fat-free product.
Here’s the bare-bones recipe: grind the fatty food in a blender. Add a cup or a few cups of water and ta-da, you have transformed the numbers.
Hey, I never said it would be tasty. But I do live up to my word. These things can be called 99 percent fat-free, according to the peculiar rules of nutrition advertising.
While you would never make food this way, or think such food is healthy, big companies do and they boldly advertise their claims. The government has allowed this to happen, and in turn, it has turned the simple, joyful act of eating into a mess of numbers and percentages. My math degree has finally come to use in the most absurd of places: it has allowed me to eat healthy.
We need to be informed as customers to make better choices. I’ll go through an example on milk and then summarize how other foods use misleading labels. I’ll end with some steps you can take to eat healthier.
How much fat is in 2% milk? 2 percent? 7 percent? Try 35 percent.
How much fat is in 2% milk? It should be 2 percent, right? But that’s not what the numbers really say. If you look at a nutrition label, you’ll see that milk has a daily value of 7 percent fat (and a whopping 15 percent of the dreaded saturated fat).
If you look closer, it’s even more confusing. You’ve been told by every health agency that what’s really important is fat as a percentage of calories. This is because calories indicate energy content, and it’s the distribution of how you get calories from fat, protein, and carbohydrates that matter. If you calculate percentage of calories from fat, you find that 2% milk is really 35 percent fat. That bears repeating: 2% milk is really 35 percent fat. Every dietitian and nutritionist knows it, but the label remains.
So where does the 2% milk-fat figure come from? This figure comes from a trick of cooking the numbers. It depends on the observation that milk is mostly water, which weighs a lot but has no fat or calories. To obscure the true fat, milk companies use the convention of calculating fat as a percentage of weight. To verify the figure, you can divide the grams of fat by the grams of the serving size in the nutrition facts. Tricky, isn’t it? The 2% is milk-fat by weight. But who eats by weighing their food?
The trick is particularly useful. Notice that as you add more water (or other non-fat, non-calorie ingredients) to a food product, you will increase the weight while keeping fat constant. This has the effect of reducing the fat by weight, even though the fat content and calories from fat remain the same. This is a tried and true method food companies like Kraft use to make food like salad dressings look healthy (see this video from an insider).
Here is how you can derive all the numbers on milk:
Nutrition facts from nutritiondata.com
Other misleading foods
Here is a sampling of products that claim to be low in fat using the “fat by weight” measure. When you look at them as “fat by calories”—the way nutrition people do—you’ll be surprised by how much fat there really is.
Fat by weight (%)
Fat as Percentage of Calories (%)
Creta Farms extra lean bologna (91% fat-free)
9
50
Hebrew National 97% fat-free beef franks
3
33
Albertson’s vegetarian refried beans (98% fat-free)
2
15
Mission 96% fat-free heart healthy whole wheat tortillas
4
14
Progresso 99% fat-free beef barley
1
13
Chef Boyardee 99% fat-free beef ravioli
1
9
Source: calculated from product websites and nutrition labels
This is just the tip of the iceberg! For whatever you eat, look closer.
How much fat should we eat?
The U.S. government suggests less than 65 grams per day, which is based on having less than 30 percent of calories on a 2,000 calorie diet. William P James, head of the International Obesity Task Force, explains the real historical motivation of this figure. It was essentially made up as a compromise. The real figure of 15 percent was more appropriate but felt to be overwhelming, given than Americans ate 40 percent when the guidelines came out.
Fat is controversial so make up your own mind. The point is you have to do a little bit of research beyond the government guidelines to get the scientific recommendations. And don’t blindly trust claims by the food companies!
Steps you can take to reduce fat
Should you start buying things like fat-free half-and-half or fat-free cheese? That’s a question I lack the knowledge to answer, except that I would contend those things are not really food. They are imitation food, designed to achieve a specific nutrition goal and make an advertising claim. That’s how I felt after reading Michael Pollan’s latest book In Defense of Food.
With that in mind, here are two strategies to get you started:
–If you’re big on labels, then ditch the nutrition claims and simply calculate the percentage of calories from fat. Divide the “calories from fat” by the “calories” on the label.
–If you’re like me, and hate going through that kind of work, then consider making better food choices. Avoid the imitation food products which identify themselves with nutrition claims. Eat the natural fat-free foods–fruits and veggies–while limiting or avoiding coconut, avocado, cooking oils and the like. Be careful about lean meats, particularly sliced meat—much of its weight is water so the product will be advertised as lower fat than it is.

I'm glad to see you're putting your math degree to good (and practical) use! :)
I closely followed my calorie input/output numbers with a software program designed to monitor my food intake and exercise program. I did it for about two months until I got tired of keeping track and entering the data. However it was worthwhile since I am now a more informed food consumer. I definitely get more nutrition for my money by eating as much fruits and vegetables as possible (especially those in season). Also I look at the salt and fiber numbers on the processed foods. As a result I have cut out some of my favorite 'treats' such as pickles and liverwurst. Interesting history on the fat guideline stat of 30 percent set as a compromise. Thanks for this post.

Mark W.: Thanks for sharing your own experience. I was much the same way: I tracked all the details for a while and then realized soon I had good enough habits it wasn't necessary. Though I have since dramatically changed my view--I now eat very much fewer foods that have packages. It's like they say: the healthiest foods (fruits, veggies) are the ones without health claims.

Presh,
LOL - I never heard the saying - "It’s like they say: the healthiest foods (fruits, veggies) are the ones without health claims."
So true.
Mark

Excellent information - thank you.
You know when I was in my 20s I could eat anything, and it didn't much matter to me. Ah, but when you get to be 30 or more ... the pounds can pile on, with a sedentary lifestyle.
The quality of our food is generally terrible. Vending machine garbage and sugar in everything? No wonder it's hard to stay healthy, and trim.
I tell my 10 year old (beautiful) daughter that she needs to pay attention now, so it'll be good habits later. (She still loves ice cream.)
I was confused by all the fat-free labels, when I KNEW the food ingredients were terrible (sugar, sugar, sugar, and high fructose corn syrup - how can that possible be good?) - now I have a much better sense of "the food game."
I think the microwave oven ... was a mistake. (bon appetite.)

Yvette:
I completely agree with you about reading ingredients that couldn't possibly be good but being convinced by labels.
The real issue is our food guidelines are based on nutrients rather than on foods. It is clear to me know that we must focus on which foods to eat rather than on trying to manipulate particular numbers, like fat or sugar.
Thanks for sharing.
I know what you mean, people are often misleading by promising labels. I am skeptical too about all these fat free products and I have real reasons to support my doubts...
http://vitanetonline.com/description/U3230034/vitamins/METHYL-1-ALPHA-75...
I like your post!! (I am a little late on this...oops) But I am a nutritionist/dietitian and I love FAT, from real food sources though. Even coconut oils, cooking oils, omega 3 fats are all good and have amazing health benefits--one of my favorite benefits is that fat keeps us full! It's all about the source though. Vegetable oils are a no go--highly industrialized. Also, for example, grass-fed beef is a whole different animal (literally) than its corn-fed, antibiotic/hormone-laden counterpart. It's good to know that at least this crowd "gets it" in terms of eating real food and forgetting the gimmicks of the food industry, which at times can be very insulting! For example, I saw some bacon and I like to get nitrate and nitrite free, and when I saw a label that said "Nitrate and Nitrite free" in big letters, I looked closer to see underneath "except for those added in flavoring". WHAT?!?! Looks like I have a long, challenging career ahead of me!
Thanks,
Jenny
jennywesterkamp.com