Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I’m hardly a constitutional scholar, but it seems pretty clear that the government doesn’t get to search your stuff without a damned good reason. And after watching the explanation as to why you should never talk to the police without a lawyer even in you believe you’re snow white and free of crime, I don’t understand why more people are kicking up a sh*t storm about Homeland Security’s flagrant violation of our fourth amendment.
That’s not true; I do understand. We’re cowering in a corner, hoping to not be the one chosen for tasering by power crazed government authorities this week. With 25 million Americans expected to travel overseas this summer, you might need to rethink what you pack.
For more than 18 months now, Homeland Security has been intermittently seizing the electronics of Americans re-entering the nation to cruise through their Blackberry data and personal files on their laptops. While some border agents perform these searches in front of the products’ owners; others retain the items to copy the hard drives and data sets for later review, telling travelers the information will be deleted after being reviewed. (After the last 8 years, do you trust the government?).
“Right now, [DHS] seems to believe that it can hold anything it wants from your laptop, BlackBerry, or cellphone indefinitely,” says Susan Gurley, executive director of the Association of Corporate Travel Executives in Alexandria, Va. “There are no limits on what they can do with it or whether they can share it with any third party.” (Christian Science Monitor)
Imagine your laptop being seized and held for several MONTHS. The official line is that these searches weed out terrorist and child pornographers. How many wannabe terrorists and child porn fetishists has Homeland Security caught in the last 18 months? I haven’t heard about any arrests, have you?
The blanket policy covers most of the electronics and documentation you could possibly to travel with.
The policies cover “any device capable of storing information in digital or analog form,” including hard drives, flash drives, cell phones, iPods, pagers, beepers, and video and audio tapes. They also cover “all papers and other written documentation,” including books, pamphlets and “written materials commonly referred to as ‘pocket trash’ or ‘pocket litter.’
Given our reliance on electronics in the business word, blanket access to our private files is incredibly dangerous and a violation of our privacy.
“A laptop can hold [the equivalent of] a major university’s library: It can contain your full life,” says Peter Swire, a professor of law at Ohio State University in Columbus. “The government’s never gotten to search your entire life, so this is unprecedented in scale what the government can get.” (Christian Science Monitor)
Accordingly, some Americans are starting to question the reach, and point out protections against searching one’s intellectual property without cause. After all, Homeland Security doesn’t have the authority to intercept first class mail.
A policy that allows for “random seizures” of your private property is practically an invitation to further harass people on the government’s sh*t list, which is pretty much anyone who stands up for the Constitution and human rights. With the terror watch list cruising past one million names, the latest search mandate perpetuates the instilling of fear among American citizens, who might otherwise question the increasing infringement of American civil liberties.
Professor Duane of Regent University points out that there are roughly 10,000 laws Americans can be prosecuted for breaking. Are you absolutely positive you haven’t inadvertently broken one? One that can be traced back to you? Do you have a single pirated song on your iPod? And, if you’re a budding Naomi Wolf or Vincent Bugliosi, that stray track might be enough to get you arrested, and serve as warning to your activist compatriots. Even better if you’re a nobody, because then the US government can make an example of you quickly and without a prolonged legal battle most Americans can’t afford.
What can you do? Daily Kos offers a number of suggestions:
In the interim, Machinist blogger Denise Caruso shares a computer security expert Mark Seiden’s suggestion to protect your data.
“Leave everything on a server, encrypted.” That way you don’t have to carry it across the border, and as long as you know you’ll have a network connection, you can get to it once you get where you’re going. This protects travelers not only from overzealous customs agents, but makes losing a laptop or having it stolen a mere inconvenience, rather than a security nightmare.

While I certainly don't like the idea of being searched in any manner (electronic or otherwise), I'm not too upset about this.
For me, the fact is that (a) most of what I have eletronically isn't personal at all, i.e. music and pictures, and (b) anything important probably isn't traveling overseas with me. If it's that important, I've got it backed up on a server or two.
Heck, even Google's own co-founder recently said in a court case: "There is no privacy anymore".

@Andrea - thanks a million for this post - I hope people will follow the links to sign the petition and contact their representatives. Of course, you know you're being added to the watch list at this very moment ;)
@ Norcross - please wake up - our rights are being deliberately and systematically eroded by a government that feeds on our fears. And its not just downloading our personal data from our electronic devices - its GPS systems in our cars, "savings" cards in the grocery store so marketing companies can monitor (and influence) our buying habits, and on and on and on. You're right - there is no privacy anymore - how happy are you with that?

@Elaine - Haha, what does the government have to do with GPS systems and store savings cards? You totally forgot to mention chem trails and government experiments on aliens at Area 51. But I guess you wouldn't want to sound too crazy.

The day will come when you won't be laughing about the chem trails anymore, Lance.
muahaha.

Norcross,
sadly, Google executives don't trump the Constitution.
If we're going to brazenly destroy the bill of rights one amendment at a time, our gov't should do us the courtesy of an official revised constitution.
Acts of terror have been committed for thousands of years; 9/11 wasn't special or unique in that regard. But it became an excuse to strip Americans of the freedoms that many people died to get
Lance,
The Taliban in Afghanistan were taking out cell phone towers because the phones were like GPS devices that could be used by the US military as tracking devices. Their logic is taking out cell phone towers versus just turning off their phones alludes me, but the gov't will use all resources when building a case against you.
And if you think your GPS device record are off limits, may you never be at the receiving end of a warrant.

Most people don't realize that Homeland Security is not bound by the constitution (at least, according to this administration).
Anywhere else in the United States, to be searched the police need a viable reason (arrest someone for probable cause/an arrest warrant) and they need a warrant to search anything not visible with plain sight (your glove compartment, your trunk, your house). They cannot take anything from you or out of your home without a warrant or an arrest. This includes electronic items, like an ipod or a computer. They need your consent to look into a bag, and your further consent to search.
It is very sad. I did a workshop for kids on this topic when I was in school in Boston. The police were harassing young teens and pre-teens on their way to and from school. It was so bad, they were forcing little boys to pull down their underwear in public to search for drugs. Can you imagine the humiliation for a 12 year old boy? We were encouraging kids to get the names of the officers and to have their parents call and complain. It would turn out that police had records miles long, but no one would do anything. I don't know why. After seeing how people are treated in the airport, I see the same cruelty that I witnessed with the cops and the children.
I don't know why people don't seem to be concerned that upon entering an airport their rights go out the window. I don't know how people don't realize the danger in giving a human being nearly complete power over another human life. I personally am appalled by the way that this is perceived. Does it really make us safer?

If you're scared that the government can willfully throw out the 4th Amendment, then why do so many seem blase about enforcing the 2nd? Doesn't seem smart to give the government a monopoly on lawful gun ownership.

Beth, that kind of power over human beings is exceptionally dangerous, as they say "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely"

Jonathan,
Questions about the interpretation of the 2nd amendment arise when you look at the rates of gun ownership v. murder rates in comparable first world
nations. There seems to be some correlation between the two.
Gun ownership
http://www.allcountries.org/gun_ownership_rates.html
Murder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate