Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Vanessa Mason is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Vanessa Mason and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Vanessa Mason is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Vanessa Mason and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
The jury is still out on the potential that social media has to facilitate social change. I would argue its widespread prevalence is a major shift in itself at least in person-to-person interaction. I wondered what the world would look like if all of these individual interactions coordinated as a major social movement, linking online and offline activity.The old way that social movements used to progress: emerge–>coalesce–>bureaucratize–>outcome–>decline
Social media definitely has the possibility to revolutionize this progression, making participation more democratic. I think the new movements start globally and move locally rather than the opposite in the past. There are countless wonderful posts describing what social media does best, so there is no need for me to reinvent the wheel. Here’s what I see as some of the defining characteristics of social media’s effect on social movements.
1) Linkages between offline and online activity are essential.
Armchair activism will not lead to substantive, sustainable change. The danger in social media is that people can mistake these tools as an end, rather than a means to an end. Rather than eliminating face-to-face interaction, social media enables and facilitates communities united behind that may not have otherwise formed, or may have been weaker for lack of social media.
2) Technology facilitates social change by reducing costs of resource mobilization.
Resource mobilization is what allows your newly formed group of supporters to organize your actions into a single coherent message targeted to the individuals and institutions that you are hoping to influence. Usually people think of money, when they see resources but there are a number of other resources related to significant actions including recruitment, advocacy, raising awareness, communication and publicity. One of the best things that social media does is reducing the monetary costs, given that many of the services are free. It also saves resource-poor groups and organizations from things like high printing costs.
3) Supporters have the ability to tell and publicize their cause’s stories, needs, and goals.
Mainstream media in the past presented a tough barrier to getting the word about your cause. Organizations usually had to relay on time-intensive means of publicity like word-of-mouth, which could be slow and impractical. Social media lowers the previously high bar to awareness raising, allowing you to tell and show the emotional side of your cause in words through blogs, audio, photos, and videos. Once your supporters are emotionally engaged, they will be more likely to become more involved in advancing the cause.
4) Social media enables greater transparency into the political process.
I wouldn’t characterize any government as being open and transparent, but there are some changes afoot that allow you a peek into the inner works of the federal government. Transparency of the political process, or at least substantial knowledge of the process, is key to help secure lasting change related to your cause. I feel that my year living in DC with several friends working on the Hill was a crash course on how the government works on a daily basis. For those who have not had this privilege, you can check out a few of the resources below.

Vanessa- Amazing post! Bravo! and this is very and a nice summize of all the possibilities social media apps can add to social change.

Thanks for the compliment! It's so exciting when you think of the possibilities that social media offers.