
This is not a pity post where I tug on your heartstrings. I’m doing your organization, whatever it may be, a huge favor. Ex-military members represent one of the greatest hiring opportunities, yet many go undiscovered because they are chalked up as “grunts” and “jarheads” rather than the highly-skilled professionals they truly are.
Even for those who hold service members in high esteem, few realize that the skills acquired by soldiers are applicable in arenas other than battlefield. The hallmark qualities of a U.S. military member: leadership, adaptability, and the ability to perform well under stress are the same traits which cause recruiters for corporations large and small to salivate. And they should.
Never before has our military been comprised of a more educated and highly trained force. The old sterotypes of only officers being college educated have been smashed to pieces as many active-duty enlisted members now not only have bachelor’s degrees, but master’s as well. Add to this language and cultural training as well as job-specific skills and you start to see a clear picture of today’s professional soldier. It is the high quality of each individual military member that makes us the the most effective and lethal military force in history.
Leadership - From the very first day of basic training military members are trained to be leaders. It starts with the personal discipline necessary to lead yourself and follow detailed instructions. Seemingly simple tasks like proper uniform wear and a clean room can become quite challenging when coupled with memorizing various pieces of military knowledge, physical training and the constant hovering of cadre or instructors watching each move with an eagle eye and a willingness to clearly point out your shortcomings.
After successfully demonstrating personal leadership military members then transition into other leadership roles becoming the ones responsible for passing on the training. Every military member is given the opportunity to lead others and practice the art of organizing a group around a common objective. These skills are practiced at home and cemented in places like Afghanistan and Iraq where the consequences of poor leadership are nothing short of getting those under your command injured or killed.
Leadership is often talked about in business and chanted at various retreats and seminars, but I can think of no better leadership laboratory than the military. On a daily basis young 20-something commanders are asked to juggle the mission, cultural relations, geopolitical concerns and the health and welfare of those in their command - all while being under the constant threat of IED’s, sniper fire and shoulder-launched rockets. Can military members lead? You can bet your life on it.
Adaptability - Our military is currently at a place in history where the mind of a soldier is quickly becoming the most necessary tool of war. The current conflicts in both Iraq and Afghanistan have shown that traditional military force is ill-suited for an nontraditional enemy that wears street clothes for a uniform and chooses mosques and hospitals for concealment. Adaptability is an essential part of succeeding in a highly dynamic and volatile environment. Military members understand this and they practice it everyday.
Take the battle of Mazar-i-Sharif in Afghanistan for instance, where U.S. Special Forces teamed up with the Northern Alliance to take the city from Taliban rule. American troops rode on horseback alongside their Afghan allies marking targets and calling them in over the radio to U.S. military aircraft who used precision-guided munitions to bomb enemy positions. I’m sure if you would have told those guys they would be riding horses the next time they went to war they would have said you were nuts, but they adapted to the environment and made real-time decisions which proved highly successful.
This is just one example of thousands where U.S. military men and women are adapting to the environment in which they find themselves and using their ingenuity to carry out the mission. This same mentality is valuable in the business world where the market is continually changing and businesses that insist on doing things the way they’ve always done them soon find themselves passed by. The ability to adapt more quickly than the opponent is what makes our military great and is a skill each member can add to any organization they enter.
Initial Solo in the T-6 Texan at Vance AFB, OK
Performance Under Stress - The military believes in stress inoculation. That is the practice of introducing members to high levels of stress early in their career so that their bodies and minds aren’t so easily rattled when placed in stressful situations in the future. In the same way your body builds immunity to a disease by being introduced to a small amount, military members are yelled at, physically trained, mentally challenged, and completely stressed at every corner during training to build immunity.
As freshman, or 4 degrees, at the U.S. Air Force Academy we were constantly forced to recite long quotes verbatim while in the push-up position. At first, it wasn’t much of a problem, but after 10 or 15 minutes when sweat was dripping into your eyes and your arms were starting to shake, the ability to remember your middle name, let alone a quote on war by John Stuart Mill, was incredibly difficult. But, over the course of the year we all got better and soon yelling became similar to a nice chat and physical stress could be temporarily ignored when it was necessary to think about something else.
The effects of this training are immensely beneficial, allowing soldiers to stay more calm and make better decisions when the world around them is crumbling. Panic attacks or getting stressed out are not options for military members who have people counting on them to lead no matter what the circumstances. As any CEO or manager knows, every business and organization carries with it some stressful situations and times, but by hiring ex-military you can rest assured that nothing will shake them enough to keep the mission from getting done.
There is no better recruiting pool in the world than the U.S. military. Every day service members retire or separate from active duty and face the daunting task of starting a new life in the civilian world. Organizations should be quick to recognize the tremendous opportunity represented in these young professionals. The ones who do will reap the rewards of highly motivated and well-equipped professionals and will be the first ones in line to hire more ex-military in the future.
***For more information, a great resource is G.I Jobs.net, a magazine dedicated to helping the transitiong between military and civilian careers.
For more timely, relevant, and engaging articles, subscribe to Brazen Careerist.
Recent Comments
Popular Posts
8 RESPONSES TO "IF YOU ARE NOT HIRING EX-MILITARY YOU ARE WRONG"
Cameron, I disagree about soldiers being ill-equipped to handle being in a small start-up environment.
The basic unit for most is the squad, 10 guys thrown together with a variety of experience and skills. Their first jobs are to learn about each other, find what they can do best to contribute to the squad's mission and work, train, live as a team and, if necessary, fight, bleed and die as a team. Leaving out the last part, that sure sounds like being in a small start up to me.
The Army, specifically, has something that is particularly appropriate for business: After Action Reviews. After a mission, the team goes through what went right, what could have improved and what they will do next time. Continuous improvement on steroids.
If you are looking for accountability, discipline, and good analysis of process, you could do far, far worse than hiring someone with military background.
Handling crises are par for the course. Vets normally keep their cool, focus on the mission and get things done when the situation appears to be falling apart. They can truly say, "I've seen life and I've seen death. This doesn't even come close to either one."
Many acquaintances of mine took the military route right after high school. And came back changed men, better men.
But in high school most of them were less than reputable characters. Don't get me wrong, they were all good guys, but they got in their fair share of trouble (as we all do).
I know this isn't true for all military men and women, but I wonder if it has anything to do with this stigma.
What do you think Cameron?
Either way, I think it's unfair and a complete waste of top talent. Unfortunately I see a lot of these guys coming back from serving us in the Middle East and they're not finding great jobs. Even though they've proved themselves as loyal, dedicated and worthy of leadership positions on so many fronts. I think it sucks.
Having recently dealt with a team that was half-military, I find issue with the points above; they fail to describe the interactions between ex-military types and their civilian counterparts:
* Leadership - Ex-military are very good with leadership roles, PROVIDED that the people that they want to lead are willing to be led. Other ex-mil types are fine with declarative roles, but civilians tend to be disruptive and insist that their superiors earn respect. In the tech group I mentored, the director performed poorly because his underlings didn't respect him: they wanted him to show competency first. He couldn't show competency because they didn't respect him.
* Adaptability - Yes, they may be able to handle the crisis du jour, but when it comes to a massive long-term disruption, the ex-mil types demand the quo status quo. Radical changes in strategy are rare for large corporations, but are common for start-ups.
* Performance under stress - I have noticed that when the stress is absent, most of the ex-mil type became listless. The civilians simply did other things, like experiment with unofficial enhancements. This surprised me the most, because during my DoD contracting days, "hurry up and wait" was the unofficial motto and dead time was common.
Ex-military may do well in a monolithic corporate environment which is structured like the military itself, but the integration into a small company workforce seems to provide unexpected challenges. Ultimately, it seems to be an either/or proposition.
I come from a military family and dated a guy in the military for about 3 years, and I have to agree with you that the training the military provides is phenomenal and life-changing.
I do think that with this type of rigorous training, sometimes your greatest strength is also your greatest weakness. In the military, the hierarchy is incredible strict and transparent, and orders are orders. It takes strong people to follow orders, but I don't think that skill translates as well in the workplace, especially when you are rewarded for taking risks in your career and succeeding.
So I wonder if people in the military expect explicit direction when they enter the workforce and that holds them back? I'm biased, but I have so much respect for what military families go through for their country.
@ Ryan,
The same was true in my high school. Some of my friends that joined were troublemakers and others were in the top of the class. I would say it was a pretty even split. The amazing thing about the military though, as you point out, is that it changes people for the better.
Now, there are always a few bad apples that go into the military troublemakers and leave the military highly-trained troublemakers, but this is the exception. Unfortunately, they help enforce the stigma you mentioned.
@Rob,
You raise some interesting observations. Obviously some ex-military can make the transition better than others.
You make a good point about leadership. In the military you do what you're told whether you respect the person telling you or not. Now, this doesn't mean that you can't distinguish between good and bad leadership, it just means the option isn't really there to directly disobey.
In the civilian world I can imagine that this attitude doesn't fly. It's completely understandable, strict adherence isn't quite as necessary because they stakes aren't as high.
As far as being ill-equipped for a small start-up environment, you may be right, but I wonder if this is changing now that our military as a whole is facing so many new challenges and changes. I think more and more opportunity is being given to soldiers at the lower ranks to innovate and change the status quo. We'll see I guess.
Would love to talk to you in 10 years and see if anything has changed.
Thanks for the good insight!
@ Monica,
I understand what you are saying. The rigidness of the military can often make it hard for anyone to really stretch the bounds and take some risks.
On the other hand, as I commented to Rob, I think we are starting to see more encouragement given to the average military member to challenge the way things have always been done. In fact, we were told by a general several months ago that if we can ever find a more efficient way to do something than we should fight to make sure it gets implemented.
It's a painfully slow process sometimes, but hopefully we're moving towards a more innovative military that champions people's minds more than their rank. We need more people like John Boyd.
Cameron, I think you are right that the military will see change in the way they do "business," just as every industry will. The pace is really what's in question, and I think the military is likely to be on the slow end of the change spectrum due to its current structure. But it's good to discuss topics like this because that's how we make progress. Thanks for the interesting article!
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?