Welcome to Brazen Careerist!
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
Emily Ma is using Brazen Careerist to share ideas. Join now to become a member and start networking with Emily Ma and other professionals just like you. Learn more.
The debate about banning or blocking social sites has been going on for some time. Listening to the conversation, it seems like the most heated debates surround the topic of banning facebook, with some making the argument that it hampers productivity and others claiming that it can help the employee get work done.
I have blogged about my productivity before. Truth be told, finding a balance or system for getting work done while being engaged in social sites wasn’t easy, but I did. It is my responsibility to get the work done, and at times, social sites like Twitter have helped tremendously. I am a firm believer in the idea that all that matters is that the work gets done on time and done well. Outside of that, what else matters?
Initially, I felt the urge to join the conversation Matt Elliott started, but I wanted to come up with something different from the majority of the comments already posted at Brazen Careerist. I wanted to find a way to articulate to employers what social media means to most people in my generation, and it hit me last week on the metro as I was reading Geoff Livingston’s white paper The Socialprise.
Geoff’s paper includes some nice insights, and I definitely encourage you to check it out. The thing that led to my great metro moment was actually a quote he provided from Charlene Li. Promoting Groundswell, the book she co-authored with Josh Bernoff, Li said:
“Social Networks will be like air. They will be anywhere and everywhere we need and want them to be. And also, without that social context in our connected lives, we won’t really feel like we are truly living and alive, just as without sufficient air, we won’t really be able to breathe deeply.”
EXACTLY! That is it right there! It’s like air! If you take social sites away, it would be like trying to breath with no air!
But how do you expect me to work all day and NOT Tweet?!
My world revolves around it, it’s so hard for me to breathe.
Tell me how I’m supposed to breathe with no air? No Air… No Air…

James, give me a break. You're equating social media to breathing? Are you really that soft and spoiled?
Does anybody remember that Judd Apatow TV show Freaks and Geeks? There's a scene where Nick, the boyfriend, is laying on his back, listening to music when he's supposed to be doing his homework. When this is pointed out to him by the father of the house, he claims that he wants to be a drummer someday, so for him, "this is homework."
To which the father replies something like, "No it's not. It's just screwing around."
That's pretty much how I characterize this debate where I've been seeing it surface. I fail to see how "at times, social sites like Twitter have helped tremendously" with productivity. Yes you met your deadlines and you did it well, and that's great. But unless you'd like to stay entry-level in a production environment, that's not enough. Perhaps that Twitter time could have been better spent suggesting an innovation, or identifying a workflow problem, or (dare I say it?) doing more than your basic assignments require.

Sean, thanks for your comment.
A few questions:
1. Which social sites/networks do you belong to?
2. Where do you sit on the career totem pole?
3. What is your job function and/or sector?
(Seriously, I’d like to hear back from you)
Now to really respond:
Do I think Social Media is as essential to my existence as breathing? NO, but it is highly important. I chose breathing to convey how important this issue is to me (and I imagine a few other people in my group).
I don’t think your example really applies because you immediately assume that there is no company benefit from me being engaged on these sites. By banning these social sites, companies are cutting people off from our networks, which can be highly valuable in certain circumstances.
I ask what your job function is because I work in PR. With my job, your networks of personal friends, co-workers, journalists, thought leaders, and old buddies from school are VERY IMPORTANT. I call on these people with whom I chat, tweet, email, friend, follow and occasionally poke regularly to discuss an “innovation” or “workflow problem” that I may have identified.
If I don’t engage and foster relationships with great people who know things and know other great people who know even more, I would be cut off from a vast source of information.
To address the twitter comment specifically, are you on twitter?
If you are, I’m not sure that you’re using it effectively. I’ve picked up AND shared so much information about new online tools, guides and great events on Twitter. Several times when searching for specific data, I’ve been steered in the right direction by people on twitter and linkedin who were once in my position. Here’s the best part: They were so helpful it SAVED TIME, and I was able to share my new info and tools with co-workers so that we could spend time “doing more than our basic assignments.”
The last piece of your comment is truly unsettling. Are you dealing with a slacker and associating them with a whole generation of workers?
Sean, give me a break. Are you really that threatened and disgruntled?
I really would appreciate a response. Thanks, Sean.

For many, social media is nothing less than an excuse to avoid work. But for those who are disciplined and focus in how they leverage it, social media can quickly provide a great value when used properly.

James, for the record, I don't disagree that social media has business merit when leveraged properly. I blog and I'm on LinkedIn; where I work, the 60-something vice president has a blog on our extranet for discussing business- and industry-related information, and we use internal wikis to manage information and keep it current.
It's possible that I missed your point, but your article compares social media to breathing. You imply that Facebook and Twitter are the same as LinkedIn. And you say things like, "I am a firm believer in the idea that all that matters is that the work gets done on time and done well. Outside of that, what else matters?"
In your response to my comment, you start to make a case for the advantages of social media, and again, I don't categorically disagree with you. But if you're interested in articulating this interest to employers, please do yourself a favor: don't compare it to breathing. It's melodramatic and undermines your position. Demonstrate the advantages of social media. Describe a problem you've solved better, quicker, faster thanks to social media. Prove the ROI. You might change some minds that way.

Sean, glad to hear that you are engaging with a few of these sites.
From your last response, it sounds like there needs to be a few breakout posts from this.
Facebook and Twitter can be used in ways similar to LinkedIn, in terms of information gathering and networking. In certain cases, those sites can do more for you than linkedin when seeking to connect.
With the "firm believer" statement, I understand to need to go above and beyond, but if I am meeting or exceeding goals, does it matter what social sites I'm visiting throughout the day? What if these sites serve as a source of information 50 percent of the time and a source of inspiration the other 50 percent?
Sitting down with the president of the company, I wouldn't say social media is like breathing. I also wouldn't play the "No Air" video as my closer. Like a said before, breathing was used to convey its importance, how I value it. For you to take in such a literal sense makes me wonder.
Sean, you didn't exactly answer, so I'll ask again.
2. Where do you sit on the career totem pole?
3. What is your job function and/or sector?

James,
I love this conversation you are having. I do believe that Twitter and Facebook have similiar values to LinkedIn. If you are caught up throwing sheep at your friends, yea its a time waster. But if you are listening to the conversations, posting great notes, finding inspiration and being productive, then yea, sit on Facebook all day long.
The people you run across online can be entirely different from those in your real life. Why not have a quick conversation with them, check out a link they throw up on Twitter and then work with them to Digg a story to the front page and get that ROI that Sean is talking about.
Social Media is not like breathing in the sense that I would die from lack of Twitter usage, but it is the lifeline of my business, keeping in touch with clients and branching out to talk to and touch more people.
If you don't like to interact, then this isn't the world for you!

James, I definitely see your point - while I don't take it literally word for word (as I don't think you intended, in all honesty) I do understand where you are coming from. Social networking is all around us and it is only becoming more prevalent as the days go by. In my opinion, businesses, entertainment centers, political candidates, personal reputations - much of anything in the 21st century thrives or falls by word of mouth and opinion, as it has in the past. I find it interesting how the advancement of technology has brought out the basics of something we have been taking a part in since we can remember.
To many, including myself, going on social sites at work is not only a welcome respite from a long stint of work (as I'm doing right now, heh) but it's also, as you said, a potential source of inspiration and new ideas from those you trust and care about. Also being a fellow procrastinator, I completely understand where you're coming from - sometimes it's not difficult to fall into the Facebook status abyss ... but other times, it's wonderful to have around when your job is driving you up the wall. :)

I think its also important to point out that James references the oxygen/breathing concept from another well noted author and book on social media in business. This isn't his idea persay but he is expounding upon the idea.
I really think as time goes, these technologies will definitely become more important in the workplace. Just like any other technology that gets integrated into the workplace (the Internets aka the series of tubes), there will need to be some clearly defined boundaries. Plenty of times I have created relationships with people because of these social sites that have given my organization more exposure and brought along great ideas.
Great thoughts James :D

I don't think LinkedIn or Blogging are on the same level as Facebook or Twitter.. and maybe it's because I am having trouble finding the value of LinkedIn.
I think it's best to find a balance in your career to weave in social media to your advantage. As a librarian, I think it's really essential to my career to use Facebook, Twitter, Blogs, RSS Feed, etc. to find better ways to reach my students and keep them informed of new resources. Also, Twitter and Facebook help me market my library services: workshops on resume writing, research skills, etc.
If Facebook has been blocked at your job, and you are feeling "suffocated" (going on the air analogy :).. I'd recommend finding a career where you can use social media within your job on a daily basis.

While Social media is considered vital to PR and Marketing, it's a waste to Manufacturing and Engineering.
No one running advanced machine tools needs to be on Facebook and any engineer doing Twitter while working could be passing along proprietary information. It's happened before, and he's doing time for corporate espionage.

I think you'd be interested in this article that explains that 1 in 4 companies block Facebook.

Amy- Thanks for the article.
As far as the leaking of secrets go, I could do that right here right now. I could do it on the phone. I could blog about anonymously from home. That argument I find hard to accept.
I've heard the bandwidth and security argument before, and I hope it's something that gets resolved soon. Don't want to cause issues there.
jrandom42 - I'm with you on the engineering part. Not everything's not for everyone. Thanks for commenting.